The Remastered History of Nigeria Part II: Medieval Northern Nigeria, Islam & Trans-Saharan Trade
Islamic trade, Rising Literacy, Slave raids, & Imperial Rivalries
In Part I of Nigeria, we surveyed modern Nigeria and traced its roots back to ancient cultures such as the Nok civilization (as early as 1000 BC). By the 11th century AD, political entities had begun to emerge: Kanem-Bornu and the Hausa city-states in the north, and the Yoruba-Ife, Edo-Benin, and Igbo-Nri polities in the south. By the 11th century, Kanem Bornu adopted Islam, wrote in Arabic, and was a big participant in the Trans-Saharan slave trade. Kanem sold slaves to the North Africans in exchange for horses and weapons.
13th Century: Kanem-Bornu and Hausaland
Under Mai Dunama Dibalemi in the early 13th century, Kanem reached the zenith —expanding across modern-day Chad, northeast Nigeria, Niger, and northern Cameroon and capturing oases like Kawar (a gateway to salt mines). Dunama also launched raids as far north as Waddan in modern day southern Libya.
By conquering parts of southern Libya, Kanem gained control of Fezzan temporarily—a key gateway to North Africa. This trade corridor allowed Kanem to funnel Black slaves, seized through jihad against the Tubu or Bulala peoples or purchased from Mali-Songhai caravans, into North African slave markets in Tripoli or Cairo.
Dunama also forcibly dismantled local African cults like the Mune, and took three pilgrimages to Mecca, dying during his last voyage.
The Sayfawa Dynasty, though long-lasting, was far from stable. By the mid-13th century, Kanem faced dynastic infighting between the Kaday and Bir factions. These crises often turned violent: Mai Kaday and Mai Ibrahim Nikale were both assassinated by their own vassals, reflecting the fragile grip of the central authority.
Despite the instability, Kanem’s armies pushed south, introducing Islam to Hausa city-states like Kano, where it began to take root among urban elites.
14th Century: Kanem Descends, Hausa Rises
Rival Factions & External Threats in Kanem
Looking below, you’ll see that the Kanem state dissolved into Bornu.
Following brief stability under Mai Salmana in the early 1300s, the Sayfawa Dynasty descended into a succession crisis between the Idrisid and Dawudid factions. From 1359 to 1383, this internal strife paralyzed the empire.
Amid this chaos, an external threat emerged: the Bulala, an eastern rival ethnic group. Their devastating campaigns killed five of Kanem’s seven kings in a single generation and conquered the trans-Saharan trade routes, the lifeblood of Kanem’s economy.
In defeat, the Sayfawa royal family fled westward and established their empire in Bornu.
Hausaland Ascends: Trade, Slavery, Specialization, and Islam
As Kanem declined, Hausaland rose. Much of what we know about early Hausaland comes from the Katsina, Gobir, & Kano Chronicle, a rich blend of myth and history that traces the rise of the Hausa kingdoms and their political traditions.
Each of the Hausa Bakwai (The Seven True Hausa states) had a distinct economic or political specialty:
Rano and Kano — “Chiefs of Indigo”: Known for their cotton textiles and indigo dye production
Katsina and Daura —“Chiefs of the Market”: Served as entrepôts for caravans from North Africa

Gobir — “Chief of War”: Positioned in the west, it frequently clashed with rival Kings and raided other states for slaves.
Zaria (Zazzau) “Chief of Slaves”: Conducted southern slave raids to supply North African Arab-Berber markets.
Biram – “Chief of Ceremonies”: Held symbolic importance in Hausa traditions and rituals.
Arab chroniclers like Ibn Battuta and his student al-Maqrīzī described Hausa and Kanem-Bornu’s major exports:
In exchange, they imported:
The Trans-Saharan Slave Trade
To supply this slave trade, Kanem & Hausaland regularly raided non-Muslim groups around them. Horses, in particular, became central to the empire’s military strength and elite culture.
The 14th century marked the beginning of a "golden age" for the trans-Saharan slave trade, which peaked between the 14th and 16th centuries. Mamluk Egypt and North African Berber dynasties depended heavily on West African gold—especially from the Mali Empire—to mint currency, and on enslaved Black Africans for labor in agriculture, domestic service, and military roles.
To meet this demand, a vast and deadly trade system evolved. Slaves were captured in frontier wars or sold through tribute. Caravans shifted from donkeys to camels, enabling longer desert crossings with fewer stops for food or water. A full Saharan crossing could take up to 80 days, with high risks from extreme heat, water scarcity, banditry, disease, or starvation.
Though exact figures are debated, estimates suggest that between 2.5 to 5 million Africans were trafficked through the trans-Saharan slave trade between 650 AD and 1600 AD.
While Kanem-Bornu & Hausaland were key players in the trans-Saharan slave trade, they were also victims of it. Arab-Berber and Tuareg raiders sometimes targeted Kanem and Hausaland for slaves. In the late 1300s, Mai Idris (1389–1421) wrote to the Mamluks of Egypt, complaining that Arab raiders were abducting his people.
The Spread of Islam
This era also saw the gradual spread of Islam in Hausaland, both from trade with the Arabs, Berbers, and Tuaregs and also through migrants from the Mali Empire like:
Malinke merchants & clerics from Mali
Fulani pastoralists and scholars who brought Islamic education & reform
In 1370, Sarki (King) Yaji I of Kano became the first known Muslim Hausa ruler. But conversion remained shallow at first—limited to urban elites and merchant families, while most of the rural population continued to follow the Bori cult and other spirit-based traditions.
Hausa rivalries continued, despite shared religion & language. For example, in the late 1300s, the Hausa King of Kano killed the Hausa King of Zaria, showing how military competition and slave raiding remained central to Hausa politics, even as Islam spread.
While Kanem declined and Hausaland rose in the 14th century, new powers emerged further south in what is now Middle Belt Nigeria.
Middlebelt Nigeria: Borgu, Nupe, Jukun, & Igala
Known for their cavalry and decentralized structure, the Borgu states would later play key roles in regional trade and warfare.
By the 1380s and 1390s, Hausa and Kanem sources begin to mention additional rising kingdoms. If you look at the map below you will see three new states: Nupe, Jukun, and Igala.
The Nupe Kingdom emerged along the middle Niger.
The Igala Kingdom, emerged near the Niger-Benue confluence.
And most notably, the Jukun Kingdom, known to the Hausa as Kwararafa (Kororofa).
These Middle Belt states maintained indigenous spiritual traditions and resisted Islam well into the 19th century, even as their northern neighbors converted. All of them were raided by Bornu & Hausaland for slaves.
Conflict and Trade Between Jukun and Kano
The Jukun Kingdom became a military rival to the northern Hausa states. The Hausa Kano state, expanding southward, attempted to subjugate the Jukun but failed to do so. After several clashes, the Jukun delivered 100 slaves as a diplomatic gesture but remained politically independent.
Eventually, they became trading partners, Jukun traders sold slaves to the Hausa city-states in exchange for horses, which was basically the “combat drone” of the 14th century in pre-colonial northern Nigeria.
15th Century
Islamic Institutions
By this period, Islam had moved beyond surface-level rituals. Hausa & Bornu Kings began to legitimize their rule through Islamic law, scholars, & pilgrimage. Arab scholars and Malian clerics established basic Qur’anic schools—called Kutab in Arabic or Makarantan Allo in Hausa—where elite children learned to read Arabic and recite scripture.
Over time, madrasas (Arabic) or Makarantan Ilimi (Hausa) emerged to offer more advanced instruction in law, grammar, and theology. These schools produced a growing class of ulama—Islamic scholars and legal experts—who began to shape court policy and local jurisprudence. (Note: literacy and Islamic education remained largely restricted to elite families).
The Ajami Revolution
One of the most important innovations of this era was the development of Ajami— Arabic script adapted to write Hausa, Kanuri, and other local languages. (Ajami means foreign script in Arabic).
This transformed state governance and trade:
Bureaucrats could maintain tax records, issue decrees, and resolve disputes more efficiently.
Commercial contracts and legal rulings were increasingly formalized
Bornu in the 15th Century
After decades of civil war and Bulala invasions, Bornu began to recover under Bir ibn Idris (c. 1389–1421), who finally defeated the Bulala and reclaimed lost territory. But while the throne survived, its power had eroded.
Real power now rested in the hands of military officials, especially:
These generals manipulated the royal succession, playing the Idrisid and Dawudid dynastic factions against each other. From 1440 to 1460, Bornu was effectively ruled by its military commanders, reducing the Mai (king) to a ceremonial figurehead.
Amid the chaos, the Idrisid faction gradually gained the upper hand. Around 1459, Ali Ghadjideni defeated the final Dawudid rival. Although customary collateral succession forced him to wait behind older relatives, he eventually took the throne in 1465.
His reign marked a political and institutional turning point:
He founded Gazargamo, which became Bornu’s new capital and political center for centuries.
He restored dynastic stability and his reforms were consolidated by his son, Idris Katakarmabe, and grandson, Muhammad ibn Idris, ending nearly a century of dynastic crisis.
Hausaland in the 15th Century
The 15th century was a period of both expansion and internal strife in Hausaland.
On the positive side, trade expanded significantly. A major route opened from Bornu through Hausaland to Gonja (in modern-day northern Ghana), facilitating the exchange of camels, salt, kola nuts, and eunuchs. The growing regional and trans-Saharan economy made cities like Kano, Katsina, and Zaria commercial hubs.
But political unity remained elusive. Hausa city-states frequently fought one another:
In the 1400s, Kano lost a war to Zaria, weakening its regional standing.
Kano and Katsina entered a century-long rivalry, marked by battles, raids, and shifting alliances.
Zamfara and Gobir, positioned in the western frontier, suffered repeated Tuareg slave raids.
Meanwhile, with Bornu’s resurgence under stronger leadership, it subordinated Kano, which paid an annual tribute of 100 slaves to Bornu—a clear signal of Bornu’s regional dominance.
The turning point came with the reign of Sarkin Kano Muhammad Rumfa (1463–1499), who ushered in a “golden age” of political, commercial, and religious reform. He constructed new city-gates, appointed Arab-Berber advisors, and founded the Kurmi Market, which became the city’s commercial heart and a hub for regional and trans-Saharan trade.
Al-Maghīlī, a Maghribi scholar, advised Rumfa to end pre-Islamic rituals and symbols. Rumfa's destruction of sacred trees and suppression of local cults signaled Kano’s turn toward Islamic orthodoxy, which helped attract more Muslim scholars, merchants, and travelers. Seeing the success, Katsina followed a similar path. Under Ibrahim Sura (r. 1493–1499), Katsina became a religious center, constructing the Gobarau Mosque and enforcing Islamic discipline—even jailing those who refused to pray. During this period, Sura also corresponded with Egyptian scholars like al-Suyuti, seeking religious guidance, which further enhanced Katsina's legitimacy in the Islamic world.
16th Century
Warfare, Gunpowder, & Songhai
The 16th century in Northern and Middle Belt Nigeria was marked by near-constant warfare, as states and empires raided one another for slaves to supply the trans-Saharan trade.
Songhai:
In the late 15th century, Sunni Ali of Songhai crushed the weakened Mali Empire, capturing Timbuktu and Djenné: vital trans-Saharan trade hubs. By the 1500s, Songhai’s influence extended into modern-day Northwest Nigeria.
But Songhai’s expansion bred rebellion. Around 1517, Kebbi, led by the formidable Muhammadu Kanta, seceded.
In the 1550s, Kanta defeated Bornu itself and briefly controlled sections of Hausaland, becoming the region’s most powerful military force. His death, however, left no strong successor, and Kebbi’s influence quickly faded.
Meanwhile, Songhai’s dominance wouldn’t last either. In 1591, Morocco’s Saadi dynasty, armed with gunpowder weapons. destroyed Songhai at the Battle of Tondibi. The message was clear: in the 16th century, guns decided empires.
Bornu:
Bornu entered the 1500s strong, forcing Kano’s King to submit and supply 100 slaves annually. But this dominance was illusory. Internal rebellions, dynastic instability, Jukun slave raids, and famine soon paralyzed the empire. Sensing weakness, Kano broke free but raided Bornu itself. Kano deliberately seized horses and slaves, the very foundations of Bornu’s military power. By mid-century, Bornu teetered on the edge of becoming a failed state.
Then came Mai Idris Aluma (r. 1571–1603), Bornu’s comeback.
Aluma was a strategic genius. Thanks to centuries of slave trading, Bornu maintained diplomatic ties with Ottoman-controlled Tripoli. After performing the Hajj through Ottoman Mecca, Aluma established direct correspondence with Sultan Murad III in Istanbul. The deal was simple: Black African slaves in exchange for Turkish firearms, armor, and military advisors. Bornu became one of the first Sub-Saharan African states to deploy guns in warfare.
With this technological edge, Aluma launched systematic campaigns across the Sahel and Sahara:
Defeated the Jukun to the south, ending their raids
Crushed the Tuareg in Aïr, securing trade routes
Reasserted dominance over Hausaland, making Kano and Katsina vassal states
By 1603, Bornu had risen from near-collapse to regional hegemon, showing that firearms and centralized authority could overcome even the deepest institutional crises.
Hausaland, Century of Blood:
While Bornu collapsed and recovered, Hausaland descended into endless warfare. After successfully raiding weakened Bornu, Kano briefly subordinated other Hausa states like Zaria and Katsina. But Katsina broke free, and what followed was a century-long rivalry marked by bloody wars, slave raids, famine, and stalemate.
Neither Kano nor Katsina could gain decisive advantage. As these two powers exhausted themselves, the Jukun Kingdom, maintaining its traditional religion and military strength, exploited the chaos. Jukun raided both of them for slaves.
17th Century
Caravans, Conflict, & Commerce
Imagine dawn breaking over the Sahara as Malam Ibrahim, a seasoned merchant, meticulously counted his human cargo for a final time. 300 camels stood poised for the arduous journey to Tripoli, but it wasn’t gold or salt that would line his coffers. It was the 150 men, women, and children, shackled together, forming the desolate heart of the caravan. Jukun warriors, captured in last month’s brutal raid. Nupe farmers, snatched from their burned villages. Children, their only sin being in the wrong place when Kano’s cavalry thundered through.
This was 17th-century Northern Nigeria, where the trans-Saharan slave trade was the throbbing, dark heart of the economy.
Here’s an example of a slave contract during this time:
Northern Nigerian states like Bornu bartered eunuchs, enslaved young men, and virgin young women, for muskets, horses, and, at times, even the services of European mercenaries.
Slaves in Society
Besides selling slaves, Kanem-Bornu and Hausaland used slaves for statecraft, military, and family building. Here’s some examples:
Eunuchs—these slaves were as high-ranking advisers since they could not bear kin to establish rival dynasties
Concubines — used to expand royal households, particularly under rulers like Sarkin Kano Muhammad Rumfa (r. 1463–1499)
Corvée labor—forced labor for farming and ore mining—became widespread in both states.
During this time, slavery was expanded through constant warfare. Look below to see the rival states involved in Northern Nigeria:
Savanna Warfare: Calculated Chaos
We have many actors in Northern Nigeria.
We have the “Seven True Hausa” states – Kano, Katsina, Daura, Gobir, Rano, Biram, and Zaria.
The “Seven Bastards” – These “illegitimate states” involved two culturally Hausa states (Kebbi, Zamfara) plus five outsiders (Nupe, Yauri, Gwari, Jukun/Kwararafa, and Ilorin).
Bornu - The big polity
Igala, Nupe, Borgu - Middlebelt polities that are mainly raided for slaves
States like Gobir, Zamfara, Kebbi, Kano, Bornu, Zaria, Jukun, and Katsina fought less to annihilate their neighbors than to skim their tax base: toll a trade route, collect tribute, grab a batch of captives to sell north. Victory was measured in customs booths opened, not flags planted.
The balance of power shifted constantly. Zaria might extract tribute from Kano and Katsina for years, only to see the tables turn.
When costs rose too high—say, after decades of pillage by Bornu cavalry or Jukun archers—even Hausa arch-rivals like Kano and Katsina paused for a treaty so they could gang up on a common adversary. A great example was when both these states targeted the Jukun in the 1650s.
Weakness invited predation. States weakened by drought or dynastic infighting became irresistible targets. Bornu capitalized on Jukun’s famine and palace infighting to inflict crushing defeats in the 1680s, part of the broader decline that would reduce the once-mighty confederation to a tributary state by the 18th century.
The relentless toll of the tsetse fly on horses fueled this cycle of violence. As horses died off, states desperately needed fresh captives to trade with Arab-Berber merchants for replacement horses – a brutal economic necessity that perpetuated the raiding.
The constant warfare that had defined the 1600s would give way to deeper challenges in the decades ahead. These challenges that would ultimately reshape the entire political landscape of Northern Nigeria.
Concluding Thoughts
Writing this essay reminds me that there’s a difference between history (raw facts & sequence of events) and historiography (the narrative we build to give meaning to those events, and which facts we choose to speak of).
This period in Nigerian history is incredibly complex and largely unknown to most people. Like all complex histories, it’s easy to spin it in many different directions.
Want to emphasize African achievement? Northern Nigeria in the 15th-16th centuries had Arabic literacy, Islamic law courts, madrasas, diplomatic correspondence with Istanbul, and access to Ottoman firearms. When someone claims “Africans had no writing before Europeans,” they’re simply wrong.
Want to emphasize pre-colonial dysfunction? These same kingdoms spent centuries in dynastic violence, military coups, endemic slave raiding, and regional fragmentation. Kanem’s succession crises, Bornu’s near-collapse, Kano and Katsina’s endless wars show that Nigeria’s modern challenges of weak institutions, ethnic conflict, and military rule didn’t start with colonialism. They were already here.
Want to emphasize technological gaps? Only after receiving Turkish muskets could Bornu dominate its rivals. When Morocco’s gunpowder army crushed Songhai at Tondibi (1591), it exposed a hierarchy: Sub-Saharan Africa lagged behind North Africa, which lagged behind Europe. Consider this: it was easier for Morocco’s Sultan, Ahmad al-Mansur, to destroy West Africa’s most powerful empire, Songhai, than to reconquer Ceuta & Melilla from Spain & Portugal: cities taken in the 15th century and still held today.
Lastly, this history raises a counterfactual: What if Europeans had never taken slaves from Africa? While Southern Nigerian coasts were changed by the trans-Atlantic slave trade, the Northern Nigeria remained largely untouched by Europeans until colonialism due to disease—Africa was, after all, known as the ‘White Man’s Grave” until the 1850s. Yet even without the contact with Europeans until the 19th century, the northern interior tells a sobering story: African Empires raiding and enslaving rival Empires, selling captives to Arabs, Tuaregs, and Berbers—entirely without any European involvement at the time.
And that’s the point: All these narratives are defensible because all are true. Medieval Northern Nigeria was simultaneously sophisticated and brutal, connected and isolated, literate and violent. The real intellectual challenge isn’t choosing one story, but learning to hold all of them together, to see literacy and bondage, brilliance and bloodshed, diplomacy and disintegration as parts of the same complex reality.
Next time, we’ll continue from 18th-century Northern Nigeria through the era of colonial conquest.
Sources
General history of Africa, IV: Africa from the twelfth to the sixteenth century
General History of Africa: V: Africa from 16th to 18th Century by B.A. OGOT
The Emirates of Northern Nigeria: A Preliminary Survey of Their Historical Traditions by S.J. Hogben and A.H.M. Kirk-Greene
Britannia
History of Borgu
Oxford Research Encyclopedia: The Kanem and Borno Sultanates (11th–19th Centuries)
A History of Nigeria by Toyin Falola
































Yaw, Your history is fine! I note two things: The fate of empires is especially interesting because of the very frequent references Richard Wolff makes to the American Empire as one in decline. What happens when power fades and is lost? The other thing is the use of Starlink by insurgents in the Sahel and its overwhelming effect on the (military) rulers of the countries. I wonder if the borders established by colonial powers will be in place in the next century. African societies may have entirely new borders in the future, with political entities shifting as they have before the 19th Century.
Fascinating! Nothing I love more than historical contexts.